QUOTE(bigMCben @ Nov 17 2007, 03:29 PM)

I was looking more closely at the title tags on my files and notice that most of the incorrect ones were a couple of tracks out and that it become worse the closer you got to Z. Could I make a suggestion that the software CANNOT deal with a blank title, so it moves the rest up to fill the space, and that's why the titles are close to being correct and also why they become further away as you move from A-Z.
Just a thought.
Hope it helps.
It's possible - Although using the beta of the latest version of MM, I've not managed to get the mis-matched tags problem to show up - either with blank tags or not. Have you run your files through any sort of 3rd party software for normalizing or Toppig'n'tailing (removal of silence from beginning/end of tracks)? etc. Something twhich could/would have re-written the tags?
See if the tagging proglem you're seeing still exists when the latest version of Music manager is made available.
QUOTE(bigMCben @ Nov 17 2007, 03:29 PM)

Also, the scroll speed for me is too slow, but Gary's told me that it's the fastest it can go without blurring. Can I suggest an option so instead of scrolling a letter at a time it can scroll a word at a time, meaning it would effectively scroll faster but without any blurring.
I dont know if word-by-word scrolling would be possible - or indeed easy-on-the-eye as each word would be potentially a different length for example: In "Simply Having A Wonderful Christmas Time" the word lengths (inc spaces) are 7,7,2,10,9,5...meaning that the display (if a scroll word-by-word option were made available) would jump 7 lettets, then another 7 letters (so far, so good) then only 2 letters, then a big 10 letters, then 9 letters and so on. Also the 2500 would need to either store or calculate the jumps eg (7,7,2,10,9,5) somewhere...and also what timing should there be between word displays eg: Display first word for x seconds, then jump 7, then wait for x seconds then jump 2 - or should jumping time be relative to the size of the jump?.
With the scroll speed as it is - its still faster than manually thumbing CD cases, or vinyl boxes for that matter - but I've made a note of both your "blanks" idea, and the scrolling by word idea too.