QUOTE(spinner @ Oct 25 2007, 12:03 AM)

tempo shifting beyond about 10% can evoke audible artefacts.
Those artefacts are the tainting to which I was refering to above on the D2.
QUOTE(spinner @ Oct 25 2007, 12:03 AM)

We have some incremental enhancements planned which will get keylock as good as a time slice implementation can get, by identifying measures and synchronising slices around the beats. Firmware 1.09 has increased slice density which improves quality when stretching pure tones such as vocals or classical guitar."[/i]
Depending on genres played, and as mobile DJs I would say that most of the music that most of us play contains vocals, Numarks 1.09 firmware to try to improve vocals during Key Adjusting is fairly important. However, attempting to acheive this by increasing slice density could have an impact on processor usage. Whether or not that impact will be noticed remains will be another "wait and see" test. Similarly, "identifying measures and synchronising slices around the beats" sounds like it relies on auto-bpm detection - which isn't a strong point for any DJ manufacturer across the board. But, I wish Numark well with it - they're a great bunch.
This is an incredible moment in time for the move away from Make-do and Windows based methods of playing tunes from hard drives, to proper hard drives controllers for all companies involved.
An exciting time, during which a lot can, and no doubt will change - hopefully (from the users point of view) without undue compromise.