ian . 0 Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Hey guys - Whats the difference between a Behringer Feedback Destroyer Pro and a BEHRINGER T1954 VACUME TUBE SOUND ENHANCER? It sound to me like the vac one is out of the ark.... Is that the case, or is it the doggies wotsits? <a href="http://www.djassociates.org"><img src="http://www.djassociates.org/anims/compres_banner.gif" alt="Join the DJ Associates Disc Jockey Association" border="0" width="468" height="60"></a> Link to post Share on other sites
DJ Marky Marc 0 Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 The Feedback Destroyer is just what it says on the box... it basicly detects feedback noise and eqs/limmits the feedback out... how well it works is down to how you set it up... The sound enhancer will not get rid of feedback... Tubes give a warm sound and are liked by many HIFI buffs and guitar players... your a Disco/karaoke not a band so forget this unit... If your up for changing the way your disco sounds and want to tweek things then a stereo EQ like the UltraGraph or Ultracurve would be better... <a href="http://www.djassociates.org"><img src="http://www.djassociates.org/anims/compres_banner.gif" alt="Join the DJ Associates Disc Jockey Association" border="0" width="468" height="60"></a> Link to post Share on other sites
Gary 0 Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 For sound enhancement in a disco situation try a Behringer 3200. Theres a review of it in the DJs United Review pages - Here Link to post Share on other sites
ian . 0 Posted February 16, 2006 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Hmmmm.... For some reason I got my thingies mucked up. http://www.dj-forum.co.uk/html//emoticons/wacko.gif I didn' actually mean to type feedback destroyer, but Behringer Ultrafex Pro Multiband Sound Enhancer instead. Is that a good investment? <a href="http://www.djassociates.org"><img src="http://www.djassociates.org/anims/compres_banner.gif" alt="Join the DJ Associates Disc Jockey Association" border="0" width="468" height="60"></a> Link to post Share on other sites
norty303 0 Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Spend money on a decent sound system if i was you. A 'sound enhancer' will still be limited by the abilities of your speakers, and any enhancement on a good rig should be achievable by good use of the EQ. If you're after special effects thats another story. I see sound reinforcement as making a true image of the recorded material, but louder. If you want to add lots of bottom end using a harmonics genrator then you are detracting from the original content. Also, when i want more bottom end I simply EQ more in. I have a rig thats capable of doing it, with enough headroom. I know of a few people who've bought Aphex Big Bottoms who've gone 'Wow, what great bass - then come asking about recones for their bass bins' Remember, you can't polish a turd DIY plans and pro audio related technical discussions www.speakerplans.com/forum Link to post Share on other sites
ian . 0 Posted February 17, 2006 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2006 Yeah - you're right. I'm gonna forget the enhancer and just have the Behringer feedback destroyer instead. Ian. <a href="http://www.djassociates.org"><img src="http://www.djassociates.org/anims/compres_banner.gif" alt="Join the DJ Associates Disc Jockey Association" border="0" width="468" height="60"></a> Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now